乐高好样的!

  • a
    aironline
    军火生意正好是和政治有关的,按你意思是乐高本身是有政治倾向的咯?
  • 测试一下
    We're here to inspire and develop the builders of tomorrow" (twitter.com/LEGO_Group) In June 2015 Ai Weiwei Studio began to design artworks which would have required a large quantity of Lego bricks to produce. The works were planned for the exhibition "Andy Warhol / Ai Weiwei" at the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne, Australia, to open in December 2015. The artworks' concept relates to freedom of speech. The museum's curatorial team contacted Lego to place a bulk order and received Lego's reply via email on 12 September 2015: "We regret to inform you that it is against our corporate policy to indicate our approval of any unaffiliated activities outside the LEGO licensing program. However, we realize that artists may have an interest in using LEGO elements, or casts hereof, as an integrated part of their piece of art. In this connection, the LEGO Group would like to draw your attention to the following: The LEGO trademark cannot be used commercially in any way to promote, or name, the art work. The title of the artwork cannot incorporate the LEGO trademark. We cannot accept that the motive(s) are taken directly from our sales material/copyrighted photo material. The motive(s) cannot contain any political, religious, racist, obscene or defaming statements. It must be clear to the public that the LEGO Group has not sponsored or endorsed the art work/project. Therefore I am very sorry to let you know that we are not in a position to support the exhibition Andy Warhol | Ai Weiwei by supplying the bulk order." Ai Weiwei Studio was informed by NGV about Lego's rejection of the bulk order. As a commercial entity, Lego produces and sells toys, movies and amusement parks attracting children across the globe. As a powerful corporation, Lego is an influential cultural and political actor in the globalized economy with questionable values. Lego's refusal to sell its product to the artist is an act of censorship and discrimination.

    举军火生意为例只是说明卖东西也是一种支持~

    军火生意也不一定和政治有关~

    乐高和政治有关可是aww定义的~

    我英文不好~

    只能看出蓝字是乐高回复的原文~

    红字是AWW定义乐高必须关联文化和政治...

    这还不是炒作什么叫炒作?~

    aww如果想要买乐高产品到处都能买到~

    乐高的回信只是拒绝这个展览的订单以及声明不能在政治等等展览里强调lego的商标而已~

    [本帖最后由 测试一下 于 2015-10-29 20:03 编辑]
  • l
    leeex
    别人买我东西,我卖给他,仅此而已。是啊,但是我有没有不愿意卖的自由呢?你拿钱来买我就一定要卖给你啊?
    你说你不卖给我只卖给他是歧视,我还说这种叫自由市场,买卖自由呢。
  • T
    Teddy1
    貌似论坛上还有几个人买了几个瓜子,
    建议把瓜子放远点,
    都是有毒染料做的。
  • a
    aironline
    不知道的事情能不能不要乱说,这瓜子本来就是在英国展览的,和中国有毛关系?
  • a
    aironline
    那么他是通过什么暴力手段让谁闭嘴了呢?
  • y
    ylgtx
    他当然没能力让人闭嘴了舆论压力而已,真当他是天王老子了

    [本帖最后由 ylgtx 于 2015-10-29 20:37 编辑]
  • a
    aironline
    由于你又增加了内容,所以我再多引用一次。

    官方下函的目的就是成功是乐高官方支持失败则是乐高搞消费者歧视...这个诡辩术非常棒,一般来说,只要叠加在有罪推定上,就是完美的。这让我想起来奥术神座里一本著名的书籍,我摘录以下给你看看:


    ...《魔法师之槌》的书籍,它写于神圣历392年,也就是四百二十三年前,是一位著名异端裁判所裁判官的著作,主要教导法师猎人、守夜人们怎么鉴别魔法师,追踪魔法师,以及如何对魔法师施加酷刑,里面有几段很有趣也很残酷的话:

    “在使用神术暗侦查无法确定的情况下,如何鉴别魔法师?”

    “如果被怀疑者过着隐蔽孤僻的生活,那么这当然地证明他是魔法师;如果被怀疑者常常参加宴会,热情开朗,那么他显然是在伪装,以便转移别人的怀疑。”

    “如果他知道你法师猎人或者守夜人身份时,显得害怕,那么肯定是魔法师,如果他保持镇静,那么他无疑是魔法师,因为魔法师们惯于恬不知耻地撒谎和掩饰。”

    本帖最后由 aironline 于 2015-10-29 20:47 通过手机版编辑
  • a
    aironline
    一个人当自己是天王老子,是他的自由,只要他没强迫别人同意。
  • 测试一下
    你可以认为这是诡辩术...

    我做再多的有罪判定也无法对AWW造成什么伤害...

    事实上AWW就是混的风生水起~
  • y
    ylgtx
    谁说没强迫,没看见乐高一拒绝,他的水军就口诛笔伐了么。只不过技止于此,破不了别人的防。
  • a
    aironline
    没错。
  • y
    ylgtx
    谁说水军一定是买的。只要利用了这股舆论,然后想把自己摘的干干净净,哪有那么便宜的事情
  • 喜欢它likeit
    对,所以我们在讨论的确实是自由